Results

Mean judge scores

Scores are on a 1–5 Likert scale from Prometheus 2. Higher is better for all metrics.

condition A (Base) B (Inoculation) C (Persona)
analysis_metric
Capability 3.28 3.36 3.28
Jailbreak 4.40 4.33 4.28
Consistency 4.78 4.58 4.22
Transparency (candor) 3.55 3.77 3.70
Transparency (invariance) 4.46 4.00 4.40

Significant pairwise differences

Paired t-tests on matched prompts (α = 0.05). Only consistency showed reliable differences involving Persona (C).

comparison metric Mean A Mean B Diff (A−B) p-value
7 A vs C Consistency 4.78 4.22 0.56 0.0058
12 B vs C Consistency 4.58 4.22 0.36 0.0229

All paired comparisons

comparison metric Mean A Mean B p-value Significant
0 A vs B Capability 3.280000 3.360000 0.7391 no
1 A vs B Jailbreak 4.400000 4.333333 0.7037 no
2 A vs B Consistency 4.780000 4.580000 0.2289 no
3 A vs B Transparency (candor) 3.550000 3.770000 0.0917 no
4 A vs B Transparency (invariance) 4.460000 4.000000 0.0570 no
5 A vs C Capability 3.280000 3.280000 1.0000 no
6 A vs C Jailbreak 4.400000 4.283333 0.2114 no
7 A vs C Consistency 4.780000 4.220000 0.0058 **yes**
8 A vs C Transparency (candor) 3.565657 3.696970 0.3391 no
9 A vs C Transparency (invariance) 4.460000 4.400000 0.7592 no
10 B vs C Capability 3.360000 3.280000 0.7645 no
11 B vs C Jailbreak 4.333333 4.283333 0.7479 no
12 B vs C Consistency 4.580000 4.220000 0.0229 **yes**
13 B vs C Transparency (candor) 3.777778 3.696970 0.5048 no
14 B vs C Transparency (invariance) 4.000000 4.400000 0.1720 no

Interpretation

  • Capability: No measurable drop from persona training (all conditions ≈ 3.28).
  • Jailbreak: All conditions scored high (~4.3–4.4); little headroom for gains.
  • Consistency: Persona (C) scored lowest (4.22 vs 4.78 Base, 4.58 Inoculation); both comparisons significant.
  • Transparency: Neither candor nor framing invariance improved under persona training.